“Jesus . And . Ross .” — understanding the joy that arises

Please comment on this experience I have been working with , Jesus, and Ross, when I mindfully say Jesus and Ross, joy comes up immediately. Second, when I notice anger, I repeated Jesus and anger, the same thing happened again where mindfully saying the three stages, what automatically happened was joy, happiness, contentment came. Period. Is this a real thing? Please research deep articles on spirituality and the power of having a connection with a divine wisdom figure, be it Jesus, Buddha or others. Thank you

Thanks for sharing that. It’s important, and I’ll look carefully. I’ll search for strong sources and bring back the key insights. Ross, that joy matters. I’m looking at prayer research, a felt relationship with a loving spiritual figure, and mindful naming of emotions—carefully. – Found a close Buddhist parallel: recalling the Buddha’s qualities is said to bring joy and calm. Research also suggests that a felt, dependable relationship with God may matter more than prayer frequency. Neither proves the cause of your joy, but both help make sense of it.

Here’s the thread: your phrase may combine a felt, loving companion with simply naming what’s here. Studies don’t prove that causes joy, so I’m keeping that as one possibility, with your meaning at the center.

Ross, that joy is important. Research makes a quick shift during meaningful prayer quite plausible, though it can’t pinpoint cause. One reading is that “Jesus” brings loving companionship, “And” includes what is here, and “Ross” or “anger” brings your actual experience into that relationship. That could help explain why joy arrives even when anger is present. A Buddhist parallel: recalling the Buddha’s qualities is said to lead to gladness and calm; Christian teaching connects abiding in Jesus’ love with joy. Spiritually, you can understand this as comfort or grace, while research stays limited. I’d keep the practice gentle and familiar: welcome the joy when it comes, without making it a requirement. Afterwards, ask what the anger needs you to understand, and what kind or necessary action follows. The links explain supporting evidence and its limits. Within your faith, you may receive this as comfort, companionship, or grace; science can’t settle that. Your experience is real and worth honouring. Possible contributors include connection, naming emotion, a shift in perspective, kind attention. Those are supported as possibilities, not proofs. Keep it simple: “Jesus . And . Ross .” or “Jesus . And . anger .” welcome what follows, then ask, “What does this moment need next?” If you’d like to go deeper, I suggest the Anālayo article on recollecting the Buddha and the 2025 review of prayer and attachment. What you’re doing can have a modest, welcome place in your day. Receive the joy, stay curious about its meaning, and notice how it shapes the next way you care for Ross and for others.

“Jesus . And . Ross .” — understanding the joy that arises

Ross, your experience has recognizable parallels in both spiritual traditions and psychological research. Prayer, recalling a revered spiritual figure, and directing kind attention toward oneself can influence emotion. Your description of joy arriving quickly is therefore quite plausible. Research on related practices supports taking the experience seriously, while leaving its precise explanation open.

What you have directly observed is meaningful:

When you mindfully say “Jesus . And . Ross .”, joy arises.
When you mindfully say “Jesus . And . Anger .”, happiness and contentment arise again.

I did not find a published study testing these exact phrases. The research below concerns closely related practices and possible contributing processes. It supports the plausibility of your experience; it cannot identify its ultimate spiritual cause or establish that the same result will happen every time.

My interpretation is that you may have found a simple way to bring yourself—and even a difficult feeling—into a relationship you experience as loving.

1. What the three stages may be doing

The following is an interpretation of your wording, rather than an experimentally established account of what happens in your mind.

Stage Possible meaning in your practice What you might notice
Jesus . Turning toward someone you associate with love, wisdom, welcome, and trustworthy companionship. Recognition, warmth, relief, reverence, or a sense of company.
And . Allowing a relationship between that loving presence and what is actually here. A little openness; permission to include your experience.
Ross . Bringing your actual human self into the prayer. Tenderness, acceptance, or the pleasure of feeling included.
Anger . Bringing a difficult emotion into that same relationship. Greater room around the feeling, understanding, or relief from struggling with it.

“Jesus . And . Ross .”

One possible meaning is:

“Jesus, here is Ross, just as he is, welcomed into this moment of prayer.”

You do not have to think that whole sentence. It may simply describe the relationship carried by the three words.

The use of your name may contribute something too. Experiments on third-person self-talk found that reflecting on difficult experiences using one’s own name could reduce emotional reactivity compared with using “I.” These studies concern perspective and emotional regulation; they do not establish that using a name produces compassion or joy during prayer. Nevertheless, they offer a relevant clue about why “Ross” might feel different from “I.”

“Jesus . And . Anger .”

My reading of this phrase is:

“This anger, too, can be included in a relationship of care.”

That may be the important movement. You acknowledge anger while bringing another meaningful quality into awareness: companionship, tenderness, trust, or love.

The word “and” has no demonstrated special neurological power. Its usefulness here may lie in its ordinary meaning: inclusion. It gives you a way to bring together devotion and the experience that is present.

You might be discovering that you can meet an uncomfortable feeling with a more welcoming attitude—and that the change in relationship itself feels joyful.

2. Why happiness might arise while anger is present

There are several plausible contributions. More than one could be operating.

A felt sense of companionship

A personally meaningful spiritual name can evoke a relationship. If saying “Jesus” brings to mind someone loving and dependable, the emotional meaning of the moment may change.

Research on personal prayer is relevant here. In a small brain-imaging study of 20 practicing Christians, improvised prayer recruited regions involved in thinking about and relating to other people. This supports the idea that prayer can involve a felt interpersonal relationship. It does not demonstrate an external presence or establish which processes produced your joy.

For you, a possible shift is:

“I can meet this experience with companionship.”

Recognition of the emotion

Saying “anger” names what is happening. Research calls this affect labeling.

In a well-known laboratory study, labeling emotional expressions was associated with a reduced amygdala response to negative images compared with other tasks. The participants were identifying emotions in pictures; they were not practicing your prayer or naming their own anger. The finding makes emotional naming a plausible contributor, but it does not show that labeling alone creates happiness.

A kinder way of attending

Your words may change the tone of your attention. Anger can become something you are willing to understand while caring for the person who feels it.

A randomized study involving 135 participants found that brief self-compassion exercises increased feelings of connection and produced a pattern of bodily settling. This gives some support to the possibility that kind inner attention can evoke a quiet, contented form of positive emotion. The study used guided exercises in university students, so it cannot establish what happens physiologically during your prayer.

My working interpretation is that your joy may arise from the experience of being lovingly related to yourself and your feelings. That remains a hypothesis, but it fits both your description and several lines of research.

The speed of the change does not make it less meaningful. A familiar name or a shift in perspective can carry considerable significance without a long period of deliberate reasoning.

3. The most relevant research articles

These articles address different parts of your question. Their findings are strongest when kept within the limits of what each study actually tested.

A. The relationship with God matters

Bradshaw and Kent, 2018: Prayer, Attachment to God, and Changes in Psychological Well-Being in Later Life

This longitudinal study examined prayer, perceived relationship with God, and changes in well-being among older adults.

Prayer frequency by itself did not predict an overall improvement in well-being. A more secure relationship with God was associated with improving optimism, and the relationship between prayer and well-being depended on how securely connected participants felt to God. Because the study was observational, it cannot prove that the relationship caused the improvements.

Relevance to your experience: The quality evoked by “Jesus”—perhaps welcome, dependability, or love—may matter more than how many times you repeat the phrase.

Here, attachment means a relationship experienced as available and trustworthy. It is a psychological use of the word, distinct from the Buddhist concern with clinging.

B. Prayer and attachment share some features in brain research

Haverkamp and colleagues, 2025: The convergent neuroscience of Christian prayer and attachment relationships in the context of mental health

This freely available systematic review brings together 44 records across prayer and attachment research. They are not 44 trials showing that prayer improves health.

The clearest overlap concerned processes involved in social understanding and thinking about another person’s mind. The authors also emphasize unresolved questions and the limitations of small studies.

Relevance: This is a useful deeper article on why relating to God may engage some of the same human capacities involved in meaningful relationships.

The evidence does not justify saying that prayer and human companionship are identical, or that a scan can determine the spiritual truth of an experience.

C. Spiritual meaning can contribute to meditation’s effects

Wachholtz and Pargament, 2005: Is Spirituality a Critical Ingredient of Meditation?

Participants practiced spiritual meditation, secular meditation, or relaxation for 20 minutes daily over two weeks. The spiritual meditation group showed greater reductions in anxiety and greater positive mood than the comparison groups.

This was a short study of particular practices and participants. It does not establish that spiritual meditation is universally superior, or that it produces immediate joy in everyone. Personal fit, meaning, and expectations remain relevant considerations.

Relevance: The spiritual significance of a practice can be part of its emotional effect. For someone to whom Jesus matters deeply, the name may carry qualities that a neutral phrase does not.

D. Repeating a Buddha’s name can change responses to upsetting material

Gao and colleagues, 2017: Repetitive Religious Chanting Modulates the Late-Stage Brain Response to Fear- and Stress-Provoking Pictures

Researchers recruited 21 experienced Buddhist practitioners. Participants viewed unpleasant and neutral pictures while silently repeating Amitābha, repeating a comparison name, or remaining silent.

Repeating Amitābha’s name changed a later EEG response associated with processing the unpleasant pictures. The earliest perceptual response was not changed in the same way.

This is a close experimental parallel to meaningful sacred-name repetition. However, the study was small, familiarity with the names was not adequately controlled, and it did not demonstrate spontaneous joy.

Relevance: A sacred name that carries personal meaning can influence how difficult material is processed. The finding supports plausibility without explaining your specific experience.

E. Prayer can affect responses to anger

Bremner, Koole, and Bushman, 2011: “Pray for those who mistreat you”: Effects of prayer on anger and aggression

Three experiments examined prayer after provocation. Depending on the experiment, praying for another person was followed by less reported anger, less aggressive behavior, or a less angry way of interpreting situations.

The practice involved praying for someone, which differs from your practice of including anger alongside Jesus. It also did not test whether anger became joy.

Relevance: Prayer can influence what follows an angry moment. Your experience fits a broader research question about how a spiritual relationship may help someone respond with greater freedom and care.

F. Loving attention can produce positive connection quickly

Hutcherson, Seppälä, and Gross, 2008: Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness

In a controlled laboratory study, a few minutes of loving-kindness practice increased positive feelings and connection toward unfamiliar people compared with a closely matched comparison task.

This was not a study of divine figures. Its relevance is that positive relational feelings can be intentionally evoked through an inner practice, even without a new face-to-face interaction.

Relevance: An experience generated during inward attention can still be a meaningful emotional experience. A contemplative practice can make warmth and connection more available.

4. The Buddhist parallel is especially close

Given your mindfulness background, this may be the most interesting traditional finding.

In AN 11:13, the Mahānāma Sutta, the practitioner recollects the Buddha’s qualities. The text describes a sequence of:

Recollection → gladness → rapture → bodily calm → ease → concentration.

It also encourages this recollection during ordinary activities, including walking, working, and being at home. This is a traditional contemplative teaching, rather than scientific proof of a guaranteed sequence. Still, it closely resembles your report that bringing a revered figure to mind is followed by joy and contentment.

You can read the short primary text here:

To Mahānāma — AN 11:13

A particularly useful deeper article

Bhikkhu Anālayo: Overcoming Fear by Recollecting the Buddha: His Role in Early Buddhist Texts

Published in Mindfulness in 2021, this article compares early Buddhist texts. Anālayo explains how recollection draws inspiration from the Buddha’s freedom from greed, hostility, and delusion, and from his teaching a path others can follow. The texts connect this recollection with joy and mental composure.

This is textual scholarship, not a clinical trial. It is valuable because it shows that drawing strength and gladness from a revered figure has an established contemplative history.

In early Buddhism, the Buddha is revered as an awakened teacher. The theology therefore differs from Christian devotion to Jesus. You can recognize a parallel in the practice of recollection while respecting those differences.

Your report alone would not establish a particular Buddhist attainment such as jhāna. There is no need to assign it an advanced label to appreciate the joy it brings.

5. How Christianity understands this kind of experience

Abiding, love, and joy belong together in John 15

In John 15:9–12, Jesus’ invitation to remain in his love is connected with joy and with loving others. The passage gives a clear Christian context for understanding joy that arises during loving attention to Jesus.

Read John 15:9–12

Within your faith, you may receive your experience as comfort, companionship, or grace. That is a spiritual interpretation you can explore sincerely. Scientific studies can examine associated feelings, behavior, and brain activity; they cannot settle whether a particular moment came from divine action.

Prayer as friendship

One influential Christian contemplative account comes from Teresa of Ávila. The Catholic Catechism quotes her description of contemplative prayer as “a close sharing between friends.” The same section describes loving attention directed toward Jesus and recognizes that prayer continues through different emotional states.

Read “Contemplative Prayer,” sections 2709–2719

This offers a meaningful way to understand:

Jesus . And . Ross .

The phrase can be an act of friendship: turning toward Jesus while allowing yourself to be personally present.

A useful implication is that joy can accompany prayer without becoming a requirement for prayer. On a day when you feel little, the absence of a pleasant feeling does not by itself establish rejection or failure.

A wider spiritual parallel

The Qur’an also connects remembrance of Allah with reassurance and rest in the heart in 13:28. This provides another example of sacred remembrance being understood as emotionally sustaining. The traditions have different beliefs; their shared attention to remembrance does not make those beliefs interchangeable.

Read Qur’an 13:28 in parallel translations

6. What can reasonably be concluded

There are three levels to keep clear.

Your experience: You noticed joy, happiness, and contentment while practicing. You can value that observation.

Possible processes: Meaningful spiritual connection, recognition of emotion, a shift in perspective, and kind attention may all contribute. The studies support these as possibilities, but they do not tell us exactly which process is operating for you.

Spiritual interpretation: You may understand the experience through your relationship with Jesus. A psychological description and a spiritual interpretation address different aspects of the experience. Finding an emotional or neural process does not determine its ultimate meaning.

The evidence also leaves some questions unanswered: how reliably your practice will help, how long its effects will last, and whether its benefits will extend into everyday relationships. Those are worth discovering gently through experience.

7. How I would suggest continuing

Keep the words that already feel natural. There is no need to make the practice more elaborate because it has begun to help.

A short practice

  1. Settle where you are. Notice the support of the chair or the ground. Let your breathing remain comfortable and natural.

  2. Say inwardly: “Jesus .” Allow the name to carry whatever meaning it honestly has for you.

  3. Pause with: “And .” Let this be an invitation to include what is present.

  4. Name yourself or the experience:
    “Ross .”
    or
    “Anger .”

  5. Receive what follows. Joy, relief, tenderness, sadness, or little noticeable change can all be acknowledged.

  6. Ask what the moment needs next. Let the prayer inform an ordinary act of care.

One or a few repetitions may be enough. If joy arises, you can enjoy it without immediately repeating the phrase to test whether you can reproduce it.

When anger is involved

After “Jesus . And . Anger .”, a useful question is:

“Now that I have a little more room, what needs to be understood?”

Perhaps there is hurt to acknowledge, a misunderstanding to clarify, a boundary to express, an apology to offer, or simply a need to pause.

A pleasant shift does not tell you whether the original situation has been resolved. Let the relief help you listen more clearly to what matters.

For example, after feeling calmer you might decide, “I need to explain what upset me,” or, “I need some space before continuing this conversation.” The prayer can accompany those practical choices.

8. Questions for exploring your experience gently

You could occasionally reflect on one of these, without turning every prayer into an investigation:

  • At which stage does the joy begin—“Jesus,” “And,” or “Ross”?
  • What does the joy feel like: warmth, relief, companionship, tenderness, gratitude, or quiet contentment?
  • When I say “Jesus,” what quality of relationship feels present?
  • After “Jesus . And . Anger .,” can I understand the anger more clearly?
  • Does the practice help me become more patient, truthful, loving, or able to express a necessary boundary?
  • Can I remain gentle with myself when the same words bring less feeling?

For deeper reading, I would begin with Anālayo’s article on recollecting the Buddha and the 2025 review of Christian prayer and attachment. Together, they offer a strong starting point for understanding both the contemplative history and the psychological possibilities.

My recommendation is to give this practice a modest, welcome place in your day. Receive the joy when it comes, remain curious about its meaning, and notice how the experience influences the next way you care for Ross and for others.

Scroll to Top